Implementing Robust Bead Probe Test Processes
Via-In Pad Plated Over (VIPPO) Design Considerations
Screening of Lower Melting Point Pb-Free Alloys
Condensation Testing - A New Approach
Case Study for Improving the PCB Print Process Using Factory Data
DFX on High Density Assemblies
Improved SMT and BLR of 0.35 mm Pitch Wafer Level Packages
Wetting and Solidification of Pure Tin on Polycrystalline Intermetallic Substrates
Latest Industry News
MacBook, iPad Production Delayed as Supply Crunch Hits Apple
Microsoft unveils liquid cooling solution for datacenters
A Theory of (Almost) Everything
Toyota unveils new models in advanced driver-assist technology push
Tech Giants Enter Their Chips in the Race for Self-driving Cars
What will self-driving trucks mean for truck drivers?
4 Great Things That Happened When We Went Remote
iPhone 13 is going to be worth the wait: All the major upgrades we're looking forward to

Cause of Damage During Through-hole Component Insertion

Cause of Damage During Through-hole Component Insertion
During automatic insertion and clinching of two pin components we encounter small cracks in the lands or the walls of plated holes. How can we eliminate this? Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall, The Assembly Brothers, answer this question.
Board Talk
Board Talk is presented by Phil Zarrow and Jim Hall of ITM Consulting.
Process Troubleshooting, Failure Analysis, Process Audits, Process Set-up
CEM Selection/Qualification, SMT Training/Seminars, Legal Disputes
Phil Zarrow
Phil Zarrow
With over 35 years experience in PCB assembly, Phil is one of the leading experts in SMT process failure analysis. He has vast experience in SMT equipment, materials and processes.
Jim Hall
Jim Hall
A Lean Six-Sigma Master Blackbelt, Jim has a wealth of knowledge in soldering, thermal technology, equipment and process basics. He is a pioneer in the science of reflow.


Welcome to Board Talk with Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow of ITM Consulting, the Assembly Brothers. 

Today, we're coming to you from the executive lavatory at ITM headquarters.  What's our question today, Jim?

This is about automatic insertion of through-hole components, it comes from M.C. 

During the automatic insertion of two pin components and after clenching the pins, we encounter a small deformation and/or sometimes a small crack in the land or the wall of the plated hole. 

We need to use a mechanical clenching method per customer's request. 

These two pin components must sit flat on the PCB with no tilt.What do we do to reduce or eliminate the plated hole damage? 

What is the criteria for acceptability of cracks and deformations on the plated hole wall?

What occurs to me is that you're looking at treating the symptoms rather than the problem with regard to what you might be able to do with adjusting at the board level.

From my perspective and looking way back several centuries ago to my experience with auto insertion,it sounds like you've got a problem that needs resolution on your insertion machine.

Something like either worn tooling, forming tooling or tooling out of measurement, out of calibration or possibly something wrong with the program.

I don't want to state the obvious, but if you haven't done this yet, you probably want to contact the manufacturer of the equipment. 

Even if it's older, vintage equipment that you bought used, they still support it. 

I'm assuming you're buying your tooling from them or you should have been or maybe you're overdue as opposed to aftermarket tooling.

Insertion equipment is still very vogue, so I would contact them and see what they resolve.

I completely agree. 

Having worked for Dynapert for several years, which manufactured insertion equipment, I could tell you that cut and clench heads are big, heavy, mechanical parts that move really fast and they make a lot of noise. 

The general description is basically, the heads beat themselves up a lot. 

They're big, heavy metal heads snapping together to cut and clench the leads and they tend to wear themselves out or get out of adjustment and wear themselves out. 

They require a lot of maintenance and are very high replacement parts for the tooling.

Look at the tooling, talk to somebody who's familiar with this equipment, through technical support.

First adjust it correctly and then inspect the tooling to see if those heavy mechanisms might need to be replaced. 

It was a very significant spare parts system for us because the heads basically just wore themselves out.

As far as cracks and deformation on the plated through-hole, that should really be minimal and I would think IPC-610 could give you some guidelines. 

Cut and place has been around for a very long time and was very successful and was used exclusively before surface mount entered in the 1980s.

Obviously it can be done correctly, but those mechanisms do need a lot of attention.

The origin of axial insertion was basically a glorified stapler. 

A company that was building equipment to assemble shoes, the United Shoe Machine Company ultimately became Dynapert. So you had Dynapert and Universal.  Universal later acquired Dynapert. 

Panasonic made insertion equipment, still does, as far as I know. TDK, and believe it or not, Fuji.

You've been listening to Board Talk and whether you agree or disagree with Board Talk, hey, we're throwing it out there. 

When you go to solder those, hopefully no longer to be deformed through-hole joints, whatever you do, don't solder like my brother.

And don't solder like my brother.


This comment pertains more to operations which utilize wave soldering systems in their operations. However, when confronted with this dilemma in the '80s and '90s, we almost always found that a slight increase in the internal dimension/diameter of the barrel's size - both 'did the trick', and increased the quality of the soldered surface areas on both sides of the board. We also noticed that the pre-tinned leads were 'all over the place' with reference to the lead's diameter. This aspect is best addressed by your Receiving Inspection Department, and encouraging them to develop a 'working relationship' with your PCB/Rework/Touch-up Department(s).
Tim Hufnell, Retired, Smiths Aerospace
Agree with the brothers on checking equipment but hole size should be verified. Copper plating thickness variation on the PCB can cause hole size reduction as well. Make sure the supplier isn't crowding the min hole size. Maybe do a DOE using the cut and clinch equipment and do some manually and that will tell you something.
Bradley Fern, Entrust
I agree also check the tooling and also the hole size and tolerances. In addition the clinching methodology plus if the force is too much while insertion can damage the Board. Some machines while clinching they also act as Board support.
Rajeev Kulkarni
I agree with checking the tooling. Also verify the PCB hole is the correct size for the leads. Allowing the proper clearance for the machine you're using.
Paul Horn

Submit A Comment

Comments are reviewed prior to posting. You must include your full name to have your comments posted. We will not post your email address.

Your Name

Your Company
Your E-mail

Your Country
Your Comments

Board Talk
Solder Paste Volume for BGA Rework
Reflow For Rigid Flex
Delay Before Cleaning Partial Assemblies
Problems With Starved "J" Lead Joints
Solder Paste Transfer Efficiency - What/Why
Can a CTE Mismatch Cause Reliability Problems?
Going Beyond Your Solder Paste Work Life
Issues Mixing Silicone and Acrylic Conformal Coatings
Ask the Experts
Bottom Terminated Components and Vias
Is Solder Mask Considered an Insulator
Reduce Glare During Assembly
BGA BAll Sheer Testing
Components Jumping Around During Reflow
Floor Life of MSD Parts
QFN Open Solder Joints
Delamination Causing Scrap